Capability
Digital accessibility & compliance
Compliance is the floor. Usability for every person is the standard.
Most organizations treat accessibility as a final gate — an audit at the end that catches violations and generates a remediation punchlist. The work is technically correct but structurally backwards. By the time an audit finds the problems, the design decisions that caused them are locked in, the budget for fixing them is gone, and the remediation cycle adds weeks or months to the timeline.
Tunlaw reverses that sequence. Accessibility shapes the design from the first decision — not as a constraint that limits creativity, but as a lens that improves it. Work that's built for everyone performs better for everyone. That's not an accessibility argument. It's a quality argument.
What this looks like on a task order
Section 508 compliance
Accessibility audits and testing
Accessible document remediation
Accessibility training and support
WCAG 2.2 conformance
Assistive technology testing
User testing with diverse populations
Plain language and content clarity
Why the final check doesn't blow up the timeline
There's always a final accessibility review. That's not optional and it shouldn't be. The difference is what it finds. When the team checking accessibility is the same team doing the design and writing the content, the final audit confirms compliance instead of revealing it was never there. You get a clean report, not a 200-item punchlist that sends the project back three months. The most expensive phase of most government projects, the post-launch remediation cycle nobody budgeted for, doesn't happen because the standards were built into the decisions, not tested against them after the fact.